Someone's in the house. He's watching. He's creeping round, only you can't see him. He's watching you from the walls. He's right behind you now. Looking over your shoulder. He wants the remote control. He's a bad boy. He wants to watch bad movies. Bad bad Ronald...
Showing posts with label bad horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bad horror. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

PEEPHOLE REVIEW: Vlog (2008)

Why Am I Watching?

I'm so unbelievably bored watching this movie -- about a chick who video blogs her own murder -- that I decided to blog my own slow, tortuous death.  I think the first clue that this movie would suck is that it's produced by the same guys who brought us Saw. I hate Saw.  Actually, I didn't know about the producers, until I googled the movie and made that discovery.  Surprisingly, the DVDs distributor chose not to advertise that fact on the packaging.  Guess maybe I'm not the only one who hates that movie.

Another clue this movie would suck is the terrible copy on the DVD package.  In part, it reads "Millions watched in horror as popular sexy vlogger Brooke Marks was murdered... during one of her webcasts..."  Seriously?  Millions?  Many network shows struggle to get "millions of viewers."  Blogs don't.  Okay, yeah.  It's fiction, I know.
This buzz bows!

I'm just gonna go ahead and alert you to some spoilage, here, because, really, this film is so bad that I need to vent.  If you're astute enough to the gimmickry in Saw, then, no doubt, you'll know that there is going to be some kind of twisty plot trickery at the film's climax.  And, no doubt, if you're astute enough to the overused gimmicks of bad horror, you'll easily figure out that Brooke staged her own murder.  What sucks about this, is that Vlog director/writer Joshua Butler so brazingly pulls this gimmick out, straight from his ass, not even bothering to set it up properly, or even realistically.

The first 30 hours of the movie (oh, did I say hours?) show the uncharismatic Brooke Marks talking to her millions of vlog fans, via her webcam, sharing her supposedly interesting stories of loser boyfriends and h8rs who ambush her in public.  One gets the notion that she's suppose to be funny.  She mimics all the ladies from SNL, and spits out dialogue as if it were standup comedy.  The thing is... she ain't really funny.  Or even likable.

Oh, but wait... what's this?  Now she's, um... scared?  Can't really tell.  She's talking into her web camera... something about being scared.  Yes, that's it!  Sorry.  I couldn't tell.  She's acting more like she's watching Benji, instead of video of her exes being slaughtered on her computer screen.  But, wait... I thought she was the murderer, you ask.  Exactly!!  This is the part where I was saying that Butler was lousy at setting up his big twist.  Apparently, he couldn't figure out how to have his big surprise twist without anyone figuring it out, so he didn't even bother with the details.  He simply threw it out there, and then back-peddled his way out of it.  We sit and watch the narrative lie -- from the filmmakers POV -- as Brooke gets a phone message from the killer, an then sits down to watch on her computer (with Benji tears) as the killer reveals how "he" murdered everyone.  These scenes make no sense once the twist is revealed.  Their only purpose is to not-so-cleverly throw the viewer off the truth.  On top of this, we watch as this male alter ego of Brooke's (who we see follows her around) boldly marches out onto the dance floor at a happening club, surrounded by her friends, and stabs her BFF to death, right in front of everyone... and we're expected to believe that no one recognized her. 

I get the whole alter ego thing, and that Brooke is living inside her head.  But, this set up is poorly conceived.  As the audience, we're not watching Brooke's interpretations of what happened, as told through her blog, but watching it as it happens through the director's lens.  Butler cuts the action back and forth, from her vlog entries and the narrative of Brooke's real life, but without somehow tying them together.  His storytelling skills have failed him (and the viewer), whicj lead him to just create a lie of a movie.  What better way to fool the audience then to simply not give them any information, and then -- bam! -- unload on them.  Butler might faired better had he just filtered the story through Brooke and her vlog.  This way, the deception is from the deranged mind of the story's character.  Instead, the deception comes from the unimaginative mind of a poor storyteller.

Friday, August 13, 2010

REVIEW: Simon Says

How to Make a Horror Movie

Horny Kids Go Into the Woods and Get Dead (oh wait, that's already taken)
I was just so bored by this movie that I couldn't think of a good ay to review it. So, since the plot was so obviously cookie cutout, I decided to create a mad lib to try and reconstruct just how the creative geniiuses behind Simon Says actually came up with their highly unoriginal and uninspired story.


Let's play Mad Libs and make a horror movie!!

First, the template:

TITLE
[choose a cliche title based on a kids game]
Now the story:
A bunch of [sexy adjective] kids take a road trip to the [place where kids wind up slaughtered]. Riding in the [choose a vehicle] are a [pick a heroine type], [pick a clique type], [another clique type], [another contrasting clique type], and [pick a token minority].

The kids wind up at a [scary adjective] [scary place], but don't seem to notice anythin
g wrong. Even though the [scary adjective] [stereotypical horror bad guy] is acting real strange.

Off the kids go to (pick a place where kids get slaughtered} and proceed to [choose a sex act] or [an activity that doesn't include sex]. Soon the [stereotypical bad guy] shows up and [act of violence] all the kids with a [choose a weapon that you don't think has been used before in a horror movie].

It turns out that the [stereotypical bad
guy] is [cliche verb] with the [choose the heroine], who has had [cliche horror experience] about the [stereotypical bad guy], but why, we don't know.

[Term of exasperation] the [choose heroine again] has a showdown with the
[stereotypical bad guy] only to find out that the [choose a random character] is [verb of romantic overtures] with her. It's all for naught, because the [stereotypical bad guy] [violent verb] him.

The end? Nope, tack on an epilogue that [verb that reflects the boredom of the audience] until we get to the [adjective] conclusion.


Here's the generator, provided by the folks at Mad Glibs:

Mad:)Glibs - free online Mad Libs
How to Make a Horror Movie


CHOOSE A CLICHE KIDS GAME
SEXY ADJECTIVE
PLACE WHERE KIDS WIND UP SLAUGHTERED
CHOOSE A VEHICLE
PICK A HEROINE TYPE
PICK A CLIQUE TYPE
ANOTHER CLIQUE TYPE
ANOTHER CONTRASTING CLIQUE TYPE
PICK A TOKEN MINORITY
SCARY ADJECTIVE
SCARY PLACE
SCARY ADJECTIVE
STEREOTYPICAL HORROR BAD GUY
CHOOSE A SEXY ACT
AN ACTIVITY THAT DOESN`T INCLUDE SEX
STEREOTYPICAL BAD GUY
HORRIFIC ACT OF VIOLENCE
CHOOSE A WEAPON THAT YOU DON`T THINK HAS BEEN USED BEFORE IN A HORROR MOVIE
STEREOTYPICAL BAD GUY
CLICHE HORROR VERB
CHOOSE THE HEROINE
CLICHE HORROR EXPERIENCE
STEREOTYPICAL BAD GUY
TERM OF EXASPERATION
CHOOSE HEROINE AGAIN
STEREOTYPICAL BAD GUY
CHOOSE A RANDOM CHARACTER
VERB OF ROMANTIC OVERTURES
STEREOTYPICAL BAD GUY
VIOLENT VERB
VERB THAT REFLECTS THE BOREDOM OF THE AUDIENCE
UNDERWHELMING ADJECTIVE




And here is the end results with the answers the producers filled in for:

Simon Says
A bunch of horny kids take a road trip to the woods. Riding in the van are a Heroine, Jock Beau Hunk, Stone, Slut, and Asian Animal Lover.

The kids wind up at a creepy country store, but don`t seem to notice anything wrong. Even though the creepy Creep is acting real strange.Off the kids go to the woods and proceed to get busy or jog. Soon the Creep shows up and hackspick ax.It turns out that the Creep is in love with the Heroine, who has had a weird dream about the Creep, but why, we don`t know.
Anyhoo the Heroine has a showdown with the Creep only to find out that the Stoner is enamored with her. It`s all for naught, because the Creep torches him.

The end? Nope, tack on an epilogue that drags on until we get to the exhausting conclusion.
See how you can make your own horror movie!!

Bottom line... Simon Says ain't even close to an original horror movie. But the thing is, I don't think they really cared. The filmmakers seemed to revel in their lack of inspiration and went hog wild in filth. The problem was, they didn't have near enough a sense of humor to pull past their cliches and retreads.

However, at about the 40 minute mark, the film goes nuts. Once Crispin Glover (why, Crispin?! Why!!) meets up with a band of gun toting sports, the bloody mayhem reaches extreme pleasuredome. Bodies are flying, limbs are torn, torsos are beheaded, blood is splattered -- if only the rest of the film could keep up with the great kill sequences. Oh! And be prepared for the most hilarious gore shot that I've seen in a long time, which is a shot of the aftermath of the murder of the jogger girl. And I don't mean funny in a way that it's so bad you gotta laugh, but seriously gruesomely funny. It's worth freeze-framing and staring.
For a real mind boggler, check out the open credits. First you'll be wondering why Crispin is throwing his career away, but then you'll notice that the Lively sisters are listed -- Robyn, of Teen Witch fame (loved that movie!), Lori (who?) and their more famous Gossip Girl sister Blake (look even closer at the names and you'll see daddy Ernie's name in the cast and producer credits). Oddly, the Lively clan is absent until the very end of the film in very bit parts.

The family affair doesn't end there. Look close and see as Crispin's dad shows up in flashback sequences as, um... his dad. Then there's a couple Johnson brothers and Cunningham twins hanging around. And of course director William Dear has to play King Nepotism and hire his kid Oliver for not just a cameo, but to supervise the visual effects and stunts, and the special effects and do storyboards and second the second unit director.

There's also a Janelle Harshman listed in the many producer slots, but I can't tell if she's related to the star Margo Harshman. Whoever Janelle is, she should be thankful that Margo's in this flick. She's the only one who puts in a worthwhile performance (of course I'm bias, cuz I remember her fine role in Even Stevens). Where Crispin Glover is so far over the top that it almost topples over in embarrassment, Harshman keeps her character well anchored (and her clothes barely on).

Yeah, I know Crispin is a nutso kinda guy -- I've followed his career from the start, when he was a bit player in TV sitcoms and dramas -- but the guy is much better when a good director can tamp down his madness to give a more chiseled and fine performance.
Watch the movie for the sudden explosion of gore and violence, and Margo's bikini top -- but not for Crispin. For a better horror performance, check him out as the tweakier geekier Mortimer in Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter