Horny Kids Go Into the Woods and Get Dead (oh wait, that's already taken)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0219b/0219b45fee47b15af6608c7f921aafee1058a538" alt=""
Let's play Mad Libs and make a horror movie!!
First, the template:
TITLE
[choose a cliche title based on a kids game]
A bunch of [sexy adjective] kids take a road trip to the [place where kids wind up slaughtered]. Riding in the [choose a vehicle] are a [pick a heroine type], [pick a clique type], [another clique type], [another contrasting clique type], and [pick a token minority].[choose a cliche title based on a kids game]
Now the story:
The kids wind up at a [scary adjective] [scary place], but don't seem to notice anything wrong. Even though the [scary adjective] [stereotypical horror bad guy] is acting real strange.
Off the kids go to (pick a place where kids get slaughtered} and proceed to [choose a sex act] or [an activity that doesn't include sex]. Soon the [stereotypical bad guy] shows up and [act of violence] all the kids with a [choose a weapon that you don't think has been used before in a horror movie].
It turns out that the [stereotypical bad guy] is [cliche verb] with the [choose the heroine], who has had [cliche horror experience] about the [stereotypical bad guy], but why, we don't know.
[Term of exasperation] the [choose heroine again] has a showdown with the [stereotypical bad guy] only to find out that the [choose a random character] is [verb of romantic overtures] with her. It's all for naught, because the [stereotypical bad guy] [violent verb] him.
The end? Nope, tack on an epilogue that [verb that reflects the boredom of the audience] until we get to the [adjective] conclusion.
Here's the generator, provided by the folks at Mad Glibs:
![]() | ||
And here is the end results with the answers the producers filled in for:
Simon Says
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/687b5/687b5c7470083eee7f0a485ab18040f77a08f1c2" alt=""
The kids wind up at a creepy country store, but don`t seem to notice anything wrong. Even though the creepy Creep is acting real strange.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c71/a1c7154c136f823dea6a78001821a30b1cca002c" alt=""
Anyhoo the Heroine has a showdown with the Creep only to find out that the Stoner is enamored with her. It`s all for naught, because the Creep torches him.
The end? Nope, tack on an epilogue that drags on until we get to the exhausting conclusion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ea05/3ea05d1d6cc4c00eb188b5be2eb66b08fe329ee9" alt=""
Bottom line... Simon Says ain't even close to an original horror movie. But the thing is, I don't think they really cared. The filmmakers seemed to revel in their lack of inspiration and went hog wild in filth. The problem was, they didn't have near enough a sense of humor to pull past their cliches and retreads.
However, at about the 40 minute mark, the film goes nuts. Once Crispin Glover (why, Crispin?! Why!!) meets up with a band of gun toting sports, the bloody mayhem reaches extreme pleasuredome. Bodies are flying, limbs are torn, torsos are beheaded, blood is splattered -- if only the rest of the film could keep up with the great kill sequences. Oh! And be prepared for the most hilarious gore shot that I've seen in a long time, which is a shot of the aftermath of the murder of the jogger girl. And I don't mean funny in a way that it's so bad you gotta laugh, but seriously gruesomely funny. It's worth freeze-framing and staring.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3804/d3804543c523f750f14bb08a7a847519090f12cc" alt=""
The family affair doesn't end there. Look close and see as Crispin's dad shows up in flashback sequences as, um... his dad. Then there's a couple Johnson brothers and Cunningham twins hanging around. And of course director William Dear has to play King Nepotism and hire his kid Oliver for not just a cameo, but to supervise the visual effects and stunts, and the special effects and do storyboards and second the second unit director.
There's also a Janelle Harshman listed in the many producer slots, but I can't tell if she's related to the star Margo Harshman. Whoever Janelle is, she should be thankful that Margo's in this flick. She's the only one who puts in a worthwhile performance (of course I'm bias, cuz I remember her fine role in Even Stevens). Where Crispin Glover is so far over the top that it almost topples over in embarrassment, Harshman keeps her character well anchored (and her clothes barely on).
Yeah, I know Crispin is a nutso kinda guy -- I've followed his career from the start, when he was a bit player in TV sitcoms and dramas -- but the guy is much better when a good director can tamp down his madness to give a more chiseled and fine performance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ed09/7ed09709367847fc3de73bd0e88257979cfdd1bc" alt=""
WILLIAM DEAR?!!? The director of TIMERIDER, TAPEHEADS and HARRY AND THE HENDERSONS did this trash?
ReplyDeleteThat explains how Crispin came on board - and how the mighty have fallen...